Cacophony: Part I
out the back door.
Expletives are giving head to dangling
Semicolons are procreating
Clauses are eating out their
Syntax applauded itself and was then swiftly trampled by idioms.
Linguistics’ itinerant and abyssal itinerary
is swimming through
seven seas; adjectives
opinions; melting pots plan
Literacy’s trying to change its definitions—
Webster can’t keep up with 1’s and 0’s—
but Wifi’s being a dick right now
pages are highly saturated screens
chrysantheming tangerine lips
spiraling pause symbols are so meta
Hyperbole Band-Aided it’s abrasions
worrying no one would take its wounds seriously
— exclamation marks spatter like buckshot—
! WILL! NOT DO!!THESE !!INJURIES JUSTICE!!!!
Communication begs asylum from
semantics’ inter- vortext – uality
☛ request still pending per the exactitude of ‘asylum’ and ‘need’ in context
words are getting wasted and lured into portmanteau orgies while prefixes are sexting ‘sesquipedalian’ to each other
Demagogues break rhetoric’s back, blinding pathos,
whose nose won’t ever heal right.
blood is pouring in ellipses upon unfinished fragments
Asterisks threw a kegger party**
played beer pong with auto-correct.
(**the reason words are too drunk to read straight)
Everything’s spinning like star galaxies aste**risking their lives
just to know what a cosmos might taste like.
I. Language asked existential questions.
II. Question marks have launched a protest in solidarity
III. All involved parties agree Déscartes was overly simplistic.
Incommensurable justifications dialogue themselves into the vacuums of imprecision.
Somewhere along the lines being read between
a healing is creating itself.
Continuity is a fallacy**
**(just ask the parentheses).